|
|
|||||||||||||
|
what happens if we type these here |
|||||||||||||
|
Leading
Organizational Change, Part 1 Change is the one constant in today’s tumultuous business
environment. A company’s ability to adapt quickly to the shifting sands
of the marketplace is critical to lasting success. While change is
unavoidable in the marketplace, several forces are at work to avoid it in
the workplace. People generally resist change, even when they understand
it is needed. They may agree to change initiatives in principle, but find
it difficult to put change into practice. Old habits are hard to break. That’s why leading change is one of the most important and
challenging aspects of being a corporate manager. Chances are your firm
doesn’t lack for good ideas, sound strategies, and market insight. The
greatest factor in your firm’s continued success will not strategy or
smarts, but being able make the needed changes to respond to an
ever-changing world. The Rate
of Change
What this means is that leaders must not only facilitate
substantial changes in their companies, but must do so rapidly. The
business landscape is constantly evolving. If it takes you years to reach
your target, the target will inevitably have moved by the time you get
there. Why
People Resist Change Companies cannot change until the people in it change. Our
aversion to change is a powerful force that must be overcome to accomplish
meaningful performance improvement or strategic repositioning. A good
place to start is to understand some of the primary reasons why people are
generally resistant to change: u
Force
of habit.
Habits are extremely valuable because they enable us to perform many
functions unconsciously, preserving brain power for other tasks. But they
are also very difficult to break, and thus to change. u
Low
expectations.
Because change is difficult, it’s often hard to convince people it’s
possible. They may lack confidence in management, their coworkers, or the
proposed change. u
Past
experiences (good or bad).
Past success lulls people into thinking change isn’t needed. Past
failures may lead people to be skeptical that it will work this time
(leading to low expectations). u
Inadequate
perceived personal benefit.
Most people view corporate changes through the lens of what it means for
them. If they don’t see personal benefit, they aren’t inclined to
support change, even if it looks good for the company. u
Fear
of diminished competency.
Change often forces us to acquire new skills and knowledge, pushing us out
of our comfort zone or eroding the strength of our expertise. u
No
sense of urgency.
Unless leaders communicate a sense of urgency, people may agree with the
change but put it off. There must be motivation to act now. u
Not
enough time or resources.
Because we’re busy and have other priorities, we may find it impractical
to implement change, even though we may be convinced it’s important. Two
Dimensions of Change The responsibility of leading change is not simply making
organizational, structural, or situational changes. It involves helping
people adapt and respond positively to external change. William Bridges
describes two dimensions: (1) change—that which occurs externally
and (2) transition—that which occurs internally. He observes that
managers often make changes (which are relatively easy), but fail to lead
people through the transition in response to the change, which must
produce sustained behavioral change (which can be very difficult). This
article focuses on the latter.
Stages of
Organizational Change Organizational change initiatives usually follow a somewhat
predictable pattern. Understanding the three primary stages of
organizational change will better enable you to achieve substantial,
enduring change—such as moving towards a value-driven culture. These
stages are depicted in the figure below:
Stage 1: Edict For your change initiative to succeed, your staff must
perceive a compelling reason for it. Most people inherently resist change.
It pushes them out of their comfort zone. It forces them to break
entrenched habits. There is pain involved in changing. And when the pain
of change is greater than the pain of staying the same, meaningful,
lasting change is unlikely to occur. So people need an Edict, a compelling reason for submitting
to the pain of change. This may come in the form of a management mandate.
Better still is a client mandate (another good reason for soliciting
regular feedback from your clients). It may be some other circumstance,
such as a change in the marketplace, that compels people to change lest
they face something worse. The change must be viewed as required;
the result you want initially is compliance by your staff. Stage 2: Ethic Having first recognized the necessity of change, people
typically come to the point where they embrace the value of change.
The focus shifts from why to how. A plan is developed, tasks are assigned,
new procedures are established, and systems are put into place to support
the effort. The Ethic stage is evidenced by a surge of activity. The
motivation now comes from the fact that change is seen as strategic;
the desired result is collaboration among coworkers. And this is usually where the change initiative stalls. Just
as you are beginning to see change, the force of the Edict weakens. As you
make progress, the sense of urgency begins to fade. Without the compelling
reason, the initiative starts to lose the momentum it had at the start.
Keep in mind that the Ethic stage is hard work. In most organizations, the
strategic value of change alone is not enough to sustain the effort over
the long term. People must remain convinced that the change is not only
strategic but needed. Stage 3: Ethos In order to complete the change process, you need to reach
this next stage. Now the change shifts from being externally motivated to
being internally motivated. It becomes characteristic—
“the way we do things around here.” It’s moved from the head to the
heart. It’s no longer just what you do; it’s who you are. It’s still
hard work, but you wouldn’t dare accept the alternative. The change is
now embedded in the company culture. Impacting
Corporate Culture The most difficult—and often the most needed—changes are those that run somewhat counter to your current corporate culture. A firm’s culture can present a substantial obstacle to making needed changes. But the culture itself can be changed over time with effective leadership. In fact, the most effective organizational changes are those that are embedded in the firm’s culture. So important changes in corporate behavior typically must be made in concert with cultural changes.
Corporate culture can be defined as the sum total
of formal and informal systems that influence how things get done.
Every firm has a culture. Some result from deliberate effort. Others
evolve without much thought being given to it. Generally, the most
successful firms are those that work hard to create a specific corporate
culture that reflects their values, vision, and mission. The adjoining figure depicts the core elements of corporate
culture. A deliberate culture begins with an overall mission that defines
the firm’s central focus and a vision of what the company wants to
become. This leads to the development of formal (“process”) and
informal (“values”) systems needed to accomplish the mission and
vision. u
Process
includes systems, policies, procedures, and standards that seek to direct
how work is done—doing things right. u
Values
represent the informal network of principles, priorities, and social norms
that largely guide how employees interact with each other and outside
parties such as clients—doing the right things. Culture is shaped not only by the specific elements described
above, but by the relative emphasis given to each. Some companies stress
process, an often heavy-handed approach intent on getting employees to
comply. Other firms lean more toward values. They expect self-initiative
and principled conduct to yield the desired results. Still other companies
are so driven by results that all other elements of culture are subjugated
to it—the ends justify whatever means are necessary. Healthy
corporate cultures are those that find a balance among these elements. In Part 2
of this article, we will explore the steps that will help move your
firm or department through the difficult process of change, ultimately
fixing the change in your culture. Copyright © 2000, The Business Edge, all rights reserved
|
|||||||||||||
|
Home | Experience | Articles | Links | Contact |
|||||||||||||