|
|
|||||
|
what happens if we type these here |
|||||
|
Improving
Project Management There is probably no operational shortcoming more widespread
in our industry as the need to improve project management. Managing
projects is a demanding endeavor, and many engineers, architects, and
scientists struggle with its complexities. The result is a host of
problems such as dissatisfied clients, budget overruns, missed schedules,
quality problems, increased liabilities, lost profits, and general
organizational dysfunction. Perhaps your firm is among the many seeking to improve how
you manage projects. Where should you start? Having worked with several
companies in this regard, let me offer the following suggestions: u
Don’t
start with training. This
is a common response but a misguided one. There are some good project
management training programs available, but you’ll not solve your
performance concerns simply by giving PMs training. You need to first take
steps to ensure that your objectives are clear, that systems are in place
to support training, and that you’re prepared to reinforce putting
training concepts into action. For more on this, see my article “The
Training (Non)Solution.” u
Determine
your priorities. You
likely won’t be able to address every significant project management
deficiency at once. So determine which issues most need attention. Things
to consider include the extent of the problem, the difficulty in solving
it, and the potential benefits of doing so. I recommend ranking the
issues, then determining how many of those at the top of the list can be
reasonably addressed at one time. Later, after you’ve made significant
progress on those issues, you can begin to tackle the others on the list. It’s important to get others involved in identifying
priorities. This should not be
strictly a top-down process. You’re going to need the buy-in of your
project managers, so at a minimum they should be consulted. I advise going
still further, involving a cross section of employees at all levels who
work on projects. They will give you a different perspective on the issues
than the PMs alone, and may in fact identify problems that your PMs
overlook. For more insight on how you might engage staff in this process,
see my previous article “Tackling Operational
Deficiencies.” u
Identify
internal and external best practices. Most
likely, there are project management practices implemented on a limited
basis in your firm that are worth replicating across the organization.
Perhaps it’s the project planning process in the electrical department
or the cost estimating approach used in one branch office or how one of
your better PMs manages client communications. Looking internally for best
practices has some real advantages. You can see the benefits firsthand and
the individuals who employ those techniques can help teach them to their
coworkers. Recognizing internal best practices also sends a message that
the firm is doing some things right, which neutralizes some of the
inevitable anxiety that comes from pointing out problem areas. It’s also wise to look outside your firm for best
practices. Consultants and trainers, who you might engage later for PM
training, can be a good source, although some merely teach the basics
rather than best practices. The
Ultimate Project Management Manual published by PSMJ is another good
resource. You might talk to PMs whom you’ve hired from other firms,
asking them what their former employers did that might be worth adopting.
Don’t be afraid to look outside our industry either. There are many good
project management practices from other industries that warrant
consideration. You might be wondering: Is it necessary to adopt best
practices if just consistently doing the basic things would represent a
major improvement? No. But there are certainly advantages to implementing
best practices. It demonstrates a commitment to excellence, which likely
will generate more enthusiasm among your staff. It provides a competitive
edge over your competitors. Best practices typically will also yield the
best results. Since the process of changing how you manage projects is
difficult, you might as well pursue the greatest payback! u
Decide
which changes are required and which are only recommended. As noted earlier, you can’t expect to improve everything
all at once. Phase in changes over time, starting with those with the
highest priority. You might consider a two-tiered approach, identifying
some changes that all PMs must
adopt and some that are simply recommended for the present. This enables
PMs to see where the firm is headed in terms of reforming its project
management practices. Plus some PMs will likely adopt some of the
recommended-but-not required practices, which will aid the firmwide
implementation of those practices at a later date. u
Define
performance expectations. While
all firms track some parameters of project performance, I’m often
surprised how little these metrics seem to matter. Many firms have PMs who
repeatedly fail to meet budgets and schedules, who have unhappy clients
and disgruntled project teams—and yet still continue to manage projects!
Many more have simply never really defined what they expect from PMs. This
is a vital step in improving project management performance. Typical
metrics include client satisfaction, repeat business, budget and schedule
performance, project profitability and cash flow, and project team
satisfaction. Establish a reward system for meeting and exceeding these
metrics, a process for corrective actions, and criteria for determining
when someone should be removed from the PM role due to poor performance. u
Update
the project management infrastructure as needed. With changed project management practices, you likely will need to modify
the systems that support those practices. This may be something as simple
as creating a new form to something as complex as changing your accounting
system. Here’s an important point: If you wish to discontinue a certain
practice, eliminate any forms, reports, or procedures that support it.
This is the equivalent of “burning the boats.” You may want to
transition this change over time, but set a deadline and stick to it. If
people have the option of not changing how they do things, guess what
they’ll do! u
Now
you can start training. Having
identified what changes you’re making and having taken the steps
necessary to facilitate those changes, you’re ready to provide PM
training. The training, of course, should be customized to your firm’s
needs. Beware of training programs that focus too much on the technical
aspects of project management (e.g., budgeting, scheduling, scoping,
estimating, etc.). There should be a healthy dose of instruction on how to
improve communications, client relations, and interaction with the project
team, for these are the areas where your most entrenched project problems
are likely to be found. u
Institute
regular project reviews. The
best way to reinforce changes in how your firm manages projects is to
establish regular project reviews. This is also one of the best ways to
improve PM performance regardless of any changes in approach. Regular
reviews—monthly is usually the preferred frequency—provide several
benefits. They help confirm that PMs are complying with the firm’s
standard practices. They provide an excellent forum for a senior reviewer
to mentor a younger PM. Most importantly, they provide an early warning
system, where an objective reviewer can help identify potential or
developing problems that are better averted than dealt with later.
Experience shows that this can dramatically boost the bottom line by
preventing costly problems, or catching them before they become worse Whatever course of action you follow, make sure you follow
through. Every time company management talks about the need to improve,
then fails to, they add to the inherent skepticism and resistance to
change. If you were only going to excel at one corporate initiative,
improving project management may well provide the biggest payback. Copyright © 2005, The Business Edge, all rights reserved |
|||||
|
Home | Experience | Articles | Links | Contact |
|||||